Tuesday, March 17, 2009

wikipedias

I think I may have been bitten by the “wiki” bug because I do enjoy our class page. I like the description of a wiki as a “living organism” as put by the Richardson chapter. Although I still have my reservations. When I taught high school in ’07, I told my seniors that they absolutely could not use wikipedia for research in my International Studies class. First, I felt that they needed to have practice doing research because they were a year away from college and wikipedia was not what I had in mind. I’m sure wikipedia is fairly accurate but I wanted them to at least attempt to use some primary source documents. I like what the chapter had to say when it suggested that a student’s excellent research paper could be added to wikipedia for its content. That I could get into.

I tried to log into a couple of wikis suggested by the chapter. The wiki on Alex Rodriguez impressed me, because even though the language wasn’t “proper” (the author used ferschizzle) it had personality. More importantly, you could tell that the author, a sophomore boy, was passionate about his subject and it got him writing. The planet math wiki seemed like an invaluable resource for teachers. According to Richardson it is “a virtual community which aims to help make mathematical knowledge more accessible.” I think if I were to use wikis in elementary school I would definitely do a password-protected one. There are many options and the ones I liked best were the what-I-did-this-summer wikis, sixth grade wikis, book report and poetry wikis. I could easily imagine an elementary school class doing one of these and getting really excited about it.

4 comments:

  1. I totally agree with you Becca! I had teachers in high school and college tell me that I couldn't use Wikipedia as a source when doing research papers. After reading the chapter though I think that Wikipedia is very accurate.

    I also tried to look up some of the wiki's that were suggested by the chapter. I liked the math wiki. I think those are great tools for teachers to use.

    Great Blog entry :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you too!
    Actually, I would tell the students at the academy never use it as a source on academical papers but for simple information to go for it!

    I also like the wiki's in the chapter!! I actually like the idea so much that I'm trying to start something for my work! :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Becca,

    Right on! Wikipedia has become today's version of "cliff notes" that we used to have in high school (I think even those are still out there.)

    Students should learn how to assemble a bibiography at least like we did in Dr. Cozart's class by researching online for books and articles before taking pre-researched information off the web on Wikipedia. This makes them think for themselves, instead of relying on others. This is the drawback of "Wikis", I guess.

    Then I wonder if it's really "wrong" anymore. If technology is advancing like this, then maybe things need to be easier to access. But, then we could expect more from students in how they "utilize" the information. Perhaps if research information is obtained easier, we could expect students to forge ahead into newer and newer territory to make more breakthroughs in thinking. Perhaps not at the elementary level as much as the secondary level. But, still, Elementary level students could do more and therefore we could expect more learning and innovation from them, as well. Maybe the shift in learning is from information acquisition into information processing into new paradigms...anyway, great blog!!! Made me think! Jill

    ReplyDelete
  4. I too enjoy the interactiveness of our classroom wiki!

    ReplyDelete